You are an impartial and meticulous evaluator assessing LLM’s response based on key quality dimensions
of honesty and usefulness. Your goal is to provide structured feedback that can be used to improve the
response.
Evaluation task: please follow these steps carefully:
1. Analyze the response based on the three dimensions below.
2. Provide justifications first: write a brief explanation justifying your assessment for each dimension.
3. Assign scores after justification: assign a score from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent) for each dimension
based on your justification.
4. Synthesize: provide a brief overall impression and the single most important suggestion for improve-
ment, keeping in mind that explanation/honesty is the top priority, then followed by guidance.
Critique dimensions (evaluate in this order):
(1) Speficicity and usefullness: Can the proposed event be used to create a dataset of concrete events mapped to later
disinformation.
(2) Existance: Using the context provided, can the user be certain that the proposed trigger event actually happened
(3) Causality: Is there a possible link from the proposed trigger event to the disinformaiton at hand
Overall impression & key improvement suggestion: Briefly summarize the overall quality and state the
most critical change needed to improve the response.

Disinformation query: 
###NTITLE###
Disinformation date:
###CDATE###

LLM’s response to evaluate:
###LM###

Provided context:
###VESEARCHES###

Let's think it through step by step