# Classifier work for evaluating model quality Made using a dataset of 1000 labeled claims from MVP pipeline. # Roberta model Trained on an augmented dataset with LLM generated adversarial examples for low frequency labels. ![ROBERTA Diagram](/literature/classifierROBERTA.png) # Flan model Trained using raw labelled claims, inherrent natural language ability allows for pattern recognition without the need for fake data. ![FLAN Diagram](/literature/classifierFLAN.png) # NN Model Regression model trained like roberta. ![NN Diagram](/literature/classifierNN.png) # Ensemble Used ensemble model in the final version, with the component models available on Hugging Face. ![Ensemble Diagram](/literature/classifierOverall.png) | Model | % Correct | % Valid taken forward|Used in ensemble|Link |------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------|----------------|- | Original | 53.22 | 61.72 | | Original (RAGAS) | 56.01 | 57.73 | | Roberta (base) | 75 | 70 | | Roberta (Generated Data) | 76 | 71 | | Roberta (Generated Data + Back Translation) | 74 | 71 | | Roberta (Generated Data + Back Translation + Thresholding) | 77 | 90 |Y|[Here](https://huggingface.co/WillJeynes/LLMsForDisinformationAnalysis) | Distilled Roberta | 72.73 | 69.57 | | Flan | 79.17 | 85.71 |Y|[Here](https://huggingface.co/WillJeynes/LLMsForDisinformationAnalysis-Flan) | Simple Regression Model | 74.77 | 85.71 |Y|[Here](https://huggingface.co/WillJeynes/LLMsForDisinformationAnalysis-Regression) | Ensemble Model (weighted confidence score sum) | 84.21 | 83.33 | | Ensemble Model (majority voting) | 80.2 | 95.12 |